Monday, December 31, 2007

Praystation Portable: Your Daily Call With God

Here's a great place to get podcasts of the Morning and Evening prayers of the Divine Office:

Praystation Portable: Your Daily Call With God

Filed under: Praystation Portable — Fr. Roderick at 4:01 pm on Monday, July 2, 2007

Praystation Portable is a great podcast if you want to inject a bit of spirituality into your busy day to day life. Turn your mobile phone, your iPod or even your PSP into a powerful Praystation by subscribing to this feed. You will automatically download a fresh morning- and evening prayer for every day of the week. You don’t need to sit down in a Church to pray: Praystation makes your prayer portable!

God bless,

Dave

Thursday, December 27, 2007

Does Catholicism teach predestination or free will?

Non-Catholic assertion: "Calvinist Predestination or Arminian Free Will? Calvinism finds much of its human roots in Augustinian thought [yet] the [Catholic] church later took a semipelagian position in opposition to Augustine's doctrine."
Catholics are neither Calvinists, nor Arminians. Although Calvin quotes from Augustine, his doctrines contradict Augustine. When Protestants claim that Catholics are in "opposition to Augustine's doctrine," they show that they have little understanding of what Augustine actually taught.

Some years back, a young Calvinist and I were having a conversation about the difference between Augustine's teaching and Calvin's. After he realized that Calvin was wrong about his interpretation of Augustine, he began to doubt Calvin's interpretation of Scripture too (go figure).

For a comparison of Calvin in contrast to Augustine, see here:

Did Augustine teach eternal security?


With regard to predestination and free will, Catholicism teaches both, as did Augustine.

According to the Catechism of the Catholic Church, human beings are "endowed with a spiritual soul, with intellect and with free will." (CCC 1711). "
Freedom is the power, rooted in reason and will, to act or not to act, to do this or that, and so to perform deliberate actions on one's own responsibility. By free will one shapes one's own life. Human freedom is a force for growth and maturity in truth and goodness; it attains its perfection when directed toward God, our beatitude." (CCC 1731).

Does this mean that man can, apart from God's grace, attain justification before God? No. Catholicism also teaches that we need the help of God to be justified. That help is called grace, and it is gratuitous. Catholicism affirms:
"not only the Gentiles by the force of nature, but not even the Jews by the very letter of the law of Moses, were able to be liberated or to rise therefrom" (Council of Trent, Decree on Justification, ch. 1)

"But though [Christ] died for all [see 2 Cor. 5:15], yet all do not receive the benefit of His death, but those only to whom the merit of His passion is communicated...so if they were not born again in Christ, they would never be justified, since in that new birth there is bestowed upon them, through the merit of His passion, the grace by which they are made just." (Ibid., ch. 3)

"we are therefore said to be justified by faith, because faith is the beginning of human salvation, the foundation and root of all justification, without which it is impossible to please God [Heb 11:6] and to come to the fellowship of His sons; and we are therefore said to be justified gratuitously, because none of those things that precede justification, whether faith or works, merit the grace of justification. For, if by grace, it is not now by works, otherwise, as the Apostle says, grace is no more grace. [Rom 11:6] (Ibid., ch. 8)
So, what about predestination?

Dr. Ludwig Ott, in his text Fundamentals of Catholic Dogma affirms the following are infallible dogmas of Catholicism:

1. God, by his Eternal Resolve of Will, has predetermined certain men to eternal blessedness.

2. God, by an Eternal Resolve of His Will, predestines certain men, on account of their foreseen sins, to eternal rejection.

The Catholic Church has described this doctrine of predestination in the manner promulgated by the Council of Valence III, AD 855:
"... faithfully we confess the predestination of the elect to life, and the predestination of the impious to death; in the election, moreover, of those who are to be saved, the mercy of God precedes the merited good. In the condemnation, however, of those who are to be lost, the evil which they have deserved precedes the just judgment of God. In predestination, however, (we believe) that God has determined only those things which He Himself either in His gratuitous mercy or in His just judgment would do... in regard to evil men, however, we believe that God foreknew their malice, because it is from them, but that He did not predestine it, because it is not from Him. (We believe) that God, who sees all things, foreknew and predestined that their evil deserved the punishment which followed, because He is just, in whom as Saint Augustine says, there is concerning all things everywhere so fixed a decree as a certain predestination. " (Denzinger 322)
The Catholic Church, therefore, continues to hold in agreement with St. Augustine:
"God will, therefore, certainly recompense both evil for evil, because He is just; and good for evil, because He is good; and good for good, because He is good and just; only, evil for good He will never recompense, because He is not unjust. He will, therefore, recompense evil for evil—punishment for unrighteousness; and He will recompense good for evil—grace for unrighteousness; and He will recompense good for good--grace for grace." (On Grace and Freewill, ch. 45).
"
When therefore [God] establishes his eternal plan of "predestination", he includes in it each person's free response to his grace" (CCC 600).

For a comprehensive description of Catholic teaching of grace, predestination, and free will, see the following works by Fr. John Hardon, S.J.:

Course on Grace: Contents and Introduction
Grace is one of the most complex, ramifying and difficult of subjects, yet one most fruitful to mind and soul. We like to characterize the world of grace as a hidden world, within the world that we know rather well. Our most real life is lived within. Hidden from the measuring instruments of physical science, unknown to most non-Catholics, too little realized by many Catholics, there lies an invisible world of light and beauty and power, a world of creatures throbbing with a life that is “divine”, a world that is of vital importance to every human being. What is it? The world of grace, where Christ is King.

Course on Grace: Part I - Grace Considered Extensively
Why do we have sacraments? To give us grace. But is grace the ultimate, the “end of the line?” Is it an end in itself, a gift of God which we are simply to have, a treasure just to be hoarded? No, grace is not just an ornament. It is that, but more; it is a marvelous reality that points and inclines us to something. To what? To the Beatific Vision, Love, Enjoyment (or Fruition – a word St. Thomas might prefer) of the Divine Essence and Persons. The end of grace is a sharing in the activity and happiness of God, in the Beatific Vision of the Divine Essence. In this almost incredible Vision, there will be no species, idea, thought between God and this inmost “me,” nothing created will intervene; the Divine Essence itself will be united to my mind as the quasi-species and the term of this vision.

Course on Grace: Part IIA - Grace Considered Intensively
Sanctifying grace. St. Thomas, following St. Augustine, declares that “the justification of the ungodly…is greater than the creation of heaven and earth” (l-2qll3a9). Since the former is a supernatural work of the highest order and the other only natural, more glory is given to God in justification than by all perfections of nature. Is justification, then, the greatest supernatural work? No, the Incarnation of the Word and the beatification of the just in heaven are greater.

Course on Grace: Part IIB - Grace Considered Intensively
In considering sanctifying grace we have been considering created grace. But there is another grace, greater than sanctifying grace: Gods gift of Himself to us. In heaven God will give Himself to us in the Beatific Vision, but even here below He gives Himself to the just in a very real, if mysterious way, to help them to the Beatific Vision. God, the Triune God comes to dwell in our souls and there produces a supernatural organism which “deifies” our souls and enables them to perform deiform acts.

Course on Grace: Part III - Teaching of the Church
The following pages are a composite of all the principal declarations of the Church on the subject of divine grace. Arranged in chronological order, these documents give us not only a purview of Catholic theology on the subject but place into our hands a synopsis of the Church’s authentic teaching, on which speculative theology builds and to which every theory should conform.

What is the Role of Freedom in the Pursuit of Holiness?
We might begin by observing that there are so many elements in the pursuit of sanctity that we are liable to overlook the most important one on our side. The most important element on God’s side is obviously His grace. The most important on our side is our liberty. My purpose in this class is to look at certain aspect of the subject and while saying just a few words about each aspect to gradually pull things together in such a way that we will have at least a broad overview and an appreciation of the importance of our freedom in the pursuit of holiness.


God bless,


Dave





Friday, December 21, 2007

Are all religions true?

Beliefs are based upon three kinds of evidence:

1) experience,
2) reason, and
3) testimony of others.

Since each and every person has varying ability to reason, they experience different things, and have been exposed to varying testimonies, it should be no surprise that there are so many different beliefs in the world. Whether or not those beliefs are true is another thing, however. Some are quite unreasonable. Many are rather contrary to experience, and many conflict with trustworthy testimony.

Pope John XXIII affirmed, “In essentials unity, in doubtful matters liberty, in all things charity.” This is the axiom that I too affirm.

So what is essential? You see, that's the question which the various religions cannot seem to agree upon. One must choose for themselves who and how to worship based upon: 1) reason, 2) experience, and 3) the testimony of others. How will you regulate your life?

“Religion” comes from the Latin word,
religare, which means “to regulate.” That’s what a religion does, it regulates one’s intellect and will, one’s way of behaving and believing. When one says they “believe” in a religious sense, what they are saying is that they freely submit to being regulated by their religion.

The ancient Greeks used the word “
pisteuo” for “believe.” While it means “to think to be true” its opposite is “apeitheo,” which means, “disobey.” So when one says they “believe,” it means in this ancient sense that they also “obey.” Disobedience is contrary to “belief.” For example, with regard to the Christian religion, St. John the Apostle wrote, “He who believes (Gk pisteuo) in the Son has eternal life; he who does not obey (Gk apeitheo) the Son shall not see life, but the wrath of God rests upon him” (John 3:36). Thus, “disobedience” to God is contrary to “belief” in God.

Harvard professor R.B. Perry wrote that the root of religion is, “the attempt of man, conscious of his helplessness, to unite himself with the powers which do actually dominate." He further affirms, "True religion is better than false, but it is not less certain that religion is better than irreligion.” [
Religion. An Introduction - Lectures on the Harvard Classics (1909-1914)]. That’s sounds closer to the truth to me than “no religion that believes in God is incorrect.” A broken clock is “correct” twice a day, but that doesn’t make it a good clock.

For instance, the “Heaven’s Gate” adherents claim to believe in God. Thanks be to God that they have come to believe this fundamental truth! We can surely rejoice in the shared belief in the existence of God. When the Heaven’s Gate beliefs correspond with truth, they are correct. But what else does the Heaven’s Gate religion believe?

The Heaven’s Gate religion, though claiming belief in God, they also believe some rather strange doctrines. This was a religious sect led by Marshal Applewhite and Bonnei Nettles. In 1997, Mr. Applewhite convinced thirty-eight followers to commit suicide so that their souls could be transferred to a spaceship that they believed was hiding in the tail of the Hale-Bopp comet. They believed the hidden spaceship was carrying Jesus, and they were attempting to unite themselves to the Truth, Jesus Christ, through rather dubious means. They believed that the planet Earth was about to be “recycled.” Through suicide, they thought they would be “raptured” into this “spaceship of Jesus” as a way to survive the tribulation and enter the “next level” of existence.

Now, either their beliefs were true, or they were false. If their beliefs were false, then their adherence to falsity had rather grave consequences. Their beliefs could not be both truth and false simultaneously, right?

Truth is defined by Webster as “that which corresponds to reality.” Reality is the “set of all real things.” All of us presumably share the same universe, the same “set of all real things,” the same reality. If we do indeed all share the same reality, then it necessarily follows that we all share the same truth. There cannot therefore be a “truth for you” which is contrary to a “truth for me.” Our beliefs are subjective, but truth is not. Either my beliefs correspond with what is real, or they do not. If they do not, then my subjective beliefs are not objectively true.

Either the adherents to this Heaven's Gate sect became united together in their Jesus-Spaceship, or they made a grave error.

Insofar as the Heaven’s Gate beliefs were contrary to the truth, they were indeed incorrect. There may have been some elements of truth within their religion. But in the final analysis, if God did not will that they should commit suicide to be transported into a “hidden” Jesus-spaceship in the tail of a comet, then they DID NOT believe (obey) the will of God.

True religion is better than false. God is truth. God is love. A clock is created for a purpose: to keep time. If it fails to keep time, it is not an excellent clock, it “misses the mark” (a.k.a. “sin”). Likewise, human beings were created for a purpose: to know God, to love God, and to serve God. When human beings “miss the mark” they sin, they fail to live in accord with their Divine purpose, their full potential. They live instead contrary to Truth, contrary to Love, contrary to God. Heaven’s Gate religion is just one example among many beliefs which we could discuss which actually serve to distance adherents from their Divine purpose. Insofar as they are hindered from truly knowing God, loving God, and serving God, such religions are indeed false.

God bless,

Dave

Thursday, December 20, 2007

Letters to a teenage skeptic, #5

This is a continuation of Letters to a teenage skeptic, #1 , #2, and #3 and #4.

------------------------

My beloved Son,


I'd like to discuss what we talked about last week, this goal of living life to its fullest potential. This, in my view, is equivalent to the need to live a life of virtue and avoid vice in order to attain true happiness for yourself and for those around you. You claimed that your mother and I were being "irrational" in our discussion with you last week. I'm writing to you so that you can read and re-read the argument to see if it is indeed rational, and to respond to any of the points you believe to be irrational.


Last week, you agreed with the need to live a virtuous life. I'd like to discuss this further, by expanding upon what is meant by living a virtuous life. Then I'd like to discuss one particular virtue that modern society seems to have difficulty with, that of chastity.


Virtue is "conformity to a standard of right, a particular moral excellence" (Merriam-Webster). Vice is "moral depravity or corruption, a moral fault or failing" (Merriam-Webster). Virtue leads to happiness, vice leads to unhappiness. Ancient philosophers well before the advent of Christ, such as Plato and Aristotle, assert the virtue or excellence of a thing causes that thing both to be itself in good condition and to perform its function well. Therefore, a virtuous person is one whose moral excellence causes them to be in good condition and performing well. The same could be said of a virtuous society. The laws that govern personal behavior and those that govern society ought to then promote virtue and penalize vice. The ancient philosophers describe virtue as the "mean" or moderate amount which lies between excess and deficiency. Aristotle wrote, "a master in any art avoids what is too much and what is too little, and seeks for the mean and chooses it." (Aristotle, Nichomachean Ethics, II, 6-7). This is how I understand virtue. Do you have the same understanding? If not, please explain.


Philosophers dating back to ancient times have described what are called the cardinal virtues. These are the four principal virtues upon which all moral virtues depend. Moral virtues are those excellent qualities that guide how mankind ought to act toward mankind. There are many moral virtues, but all the moral virtues have these common qualities: being well judged (wisdom), submitting to the common good (justice), being restrained with measure (temperance), and having firmness (courage). Thus, the four principal or cardinal virtues are: Wisdom, Justice, Temperance, and Courage. In addition to these, we also have theological virtues which guide how mankind ought to act toward God. They are: Faith, Hope, and Charity.

Now, I'd like to discuss the virtue of temperance.


Aristotle wrote, "The temperate man craves for the things he ought, as he ought, as when
he ought; and when he ought" (ibid., III, 12). The specific craving that I'd like to discuss is that of sex, as modern society seems to have a skewed perspective of sexuality, distorting into what can only be called pornography or licentiousness. The moral virtue of temperance with regard to sex is called "chastity."


You said last week that you believe you have a lot of self-control, and as an example you said that there have been many times in which you have had the opportunity to have sex, but have instead chosen not to have sex. This is an example of temperance, called chastity. On those occasions, you certainly lived virtuously, choosing chastity in the face of temptation. This is the virtuous behavior we are talking about. Just because men crave something, that doesn't mean that we ought to give in to that craving. Doing so contrary to virtue is detrimental to man's true happiness.


Pornography is an example of vice, not virtue. "Trafficking in persons" is the second biggest trafficking crime, second only to trafficking in illicit drugs. Many women are forced or coerced into porn. Pornography is a six billion dollar per year industry, bringing in more money annually then all three major network television stations combined. It is a serious vice which has caused serious damage to many lives.


When men indulge their cravings by viewing pornography, it results from a lack of self control. It also tends toward and increased lack of self-control in future acts. It is known to lead to criminal behavior.


For instance, there have been military members who have been dishonorably discharged from the service because they could not master their cravings with regard to viewing pornography using government computers. They knew the computers were monitored and knew they would get into serious trouble, but they chose to give in to their temptation. They got caught, they got punished, they were booted out of the military. This is an example of what is clearly a vice, and its detrimental affect on men and women. It harms the military and it harms the families of those fired because of it. These men showed a distinct lack of self control. Would you say that one who knew they would get into trouble for viewing porn on the computer, yet chose to do so anyway had good self-control?


Let me give you an hypothetical example. Let's say a married man had sex with his secretary at work on two separate occasions. He knew that if his wife found out about it, she would likely divorce him. He at least knew that it would do serious harm to the emotional stability of his family. Although he knew this before hand, he gave into his cravings anyway. His wife found out about it. He responded to his wife by saying, "There have been many other times when I could have had sex with her and many other women, but I didn't. I think I have good self control." How do you think the wife would respond to such a defense? Is the man living a virtuous life? He no doubt remained chaste on those occasions that he did not commit adultery but could have. However, he failed to live in accord with virtue at least twice, didn't he? How many times can a man commit adultery before it hurts his wife? Do you think the wife would agree that he had good self control?


The need to live a virtuous life is a continuous need, right? It only takes one act of adultery to break one's marital vow, right? It likewise only takes one time to contract a sexually transmitted disease and pass it on to your wife, right? It also only takes one act of adultery to impregnate a mistress. Was the man above prepared to live with the consequence of the vice of his adultery? Despite his readiness to accept the consequences, didn't his choice also have an effect on his wife, his family? Don't they have a say as to whether they are to be subjected to such consequences? Did he have a right to choose adultery, given that his choice did not merely affect him, but had a communal or societal effect as well?


As a military member, I'm bound to obey the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ). Under the UCMJ, which are the laws which govern the conduct of military members, adultery is a crime [fornication has also been considered a criminal offense under Article 134 of the UCMJ]. Why would the federal government concern themselves with such conduct? Because such acts have in fact had detrimental affects upon the good order and conduct within the military society. People have been known to commit other crimes such as murder and extortion as a result of such acts.


Furthermore, the medical effects of illicit sexual conduct have proven detrimental to all societies, not just the military society. The second leading cause of death among women is cancer, and the sexually transmitted virus called HPV causes over 99 percent of all cervical cancer, which kills more women than HIV/AIDS. As you know, transmission of HPV is not prevented by condom use. The majority of sexually active women have been infected with one or more types of genital HPV. [1]
It is 46% likely that a teenage girl will acquire HPV from her first sexual relationship [2]. A man with HPV can transmit it to a woman, and a woman with HPV can transmit it to their child during pregnancy, which can result (and has resulted) in birth defects. Birth-control pills interfere with a woman's immune system, making her more likely to contract certain sexually transmitted diseases [3]. The birth control pill increases a woman's chance of having breast cancer, cervical cancer, and liver cancer [4]. The world thinks it can have sex without consequences, but that is not reality.


Moreover, being tested doesn't guarantee diseases are not present. Why? Because sexually transmitted viruses are known to be present for some time before they can be detected. There is no such thing as "safe sex." Sex always has consequences. Always. Furthermore, it is a fact of human society that a child being born out of wedlock increases by a very high percentage the probability that that child will end up in prison, on welfare, illiterate, and on drugs. [5]. Divorce also harms society. It's important to note that when a guy is married as a virgin, his divorce rate is 63 percent lower than a non-virgin. For girls, it's 76 percent lower [6]. The younger a girl is when she becomes sexually active, the more likely she is to experience multiple sexual partners, sexually transmitted diseases, out of wedlock pregnancies, depression, abortion, and poverty. [7] Our modern society seems to present illicit sexual misconduct as "normal" and "healthy." However, the facts state otherwise. The practice of fornication, adultery, or illicit sexual misconduct of all kinds is not a virtue, but a vice.


With all the problems associated with living an unchaste life, don't societies have a right to protect themselves from those who act contrary to virtue?


Illicit sexual conduct such as fornication and adultery affect not only the persons involved, but have a harmful affect upon society as a whole. Consequently, the need to live in accord with the virtue of chastity (temperance) is good for the persons directly involved, as well as the members of society who are also always harmed by their lack of virtue. It's not just a "religion thing." It is irrational for individual and for society as a whole to live contrary to the virtue of chastity, as it ruins lives. You know many people who have had their lives seriously harmed because either they or someone close to them acted contrary to the virtue of chastity. Sometimes these effects have been fatal (resulting in death). The consequences of illicit sexual conduct do not have to be limited to medical infections or result in pregnancy to be harmful. A faulty understanding of the right purpose of sex and acting upon that erroneous understanding invariable has a detrimental effect upon one's psychological well-being, which has a detrimental affect on future personal relationships, often resulting in a lack of dignity with which one tends to view the opposite sex.


What if I think I'm already "married" since I'm convinced I'm truly in a life-long committed relationship, although I'm not publically and legally (or sacramentally) married? Does that make a difference? Is it still "fornication" if we really are committed to one another? I understand how one can be absolutely convinced that they will be with the woman they love forever and ever. When I was a teenager, I too had such conviction. My girlfriend and I were determined to be together forever. We both expressed as much. What happened? She broke up with me after a year. The teenage version of "forever" often does not last very long. Indeed, judging by the divorce rates, the adult version of "forever" doesn't last long either, which is a source of great harm to society. What if I had decided that since I was "committed" to my teenage girlfriend in my heart, that it was not a sin to have sex with her? What if I had gotten her pregnant in that year, our child would have been one of the many children born outside of wedlock, with all the harmful effect that has on a child and upon society, right?


Your mother too was engaged to another before she met me. She no doubt thought he was "the one" that she would be with forever and ever. Yet, lucky for me (and you, and your sister), they didn't get married. It happens. That's why marriage, by law, is not merely about our private opinions about how long are relationship will last. It is instead a public and binding convenant having the force of law which, for important reasons, children are not competent to enter into. Why? Because children, even young men like yourself, do not have the maturity to enter into such serious life-long contracts. Teenagers, for one, lack perspective that an adult gains through experience. They also have a diminished capacity to think rationally, as their brains do not reach maturity until their mid-20s. Society knows this, as you will also know this when you are a father to one or more teenagers. Consequently, society has the right to make sure, through societal laws, that only those minimally capable of entering into life-long contract are allowed to legally do so. This is not irrational, but a very sound conclusion based upon reason, experience, and the detrimental effects of increased teen pregnancy and divorce.


It seems reasonable, then, that one should not have sex until they are married and are prepared to have children. It also seems reasonable that one should defer marriage until they are ready for the consequences of sex, that is, having children.


Yesterday you researched for me how much it would cost to live on your own as man and wife, with one child. Your estimates were a somewhat low in some areas. Nonetheless, using even your estimates, you cannot afford to have a family at age 15, can you? Your estimated expenses far exceeded your likely income. Who would pick up the difference? Your parents? State welfare? If one were see things rationally, it would be imprudent for them to get married and have child at age 15 if they could not meet the responsibilities which resulted from such a decision, correct? Would it be just to impose such burdens upon one's parents merely to indulge a sexual craving? Isn't there a way one can truly love someone, showing them affection without having sex with them? Clearly, if such a decision to get married at age 15 is imprudent, then engaging in the martial act of sexual intercourse when one cannot afford the consequences of such an act is equally irrational.
I'd like for you to take some time to think about what I've written above. Are my conclusions irrational? If so please explain.

Love and God bless,


Dad

Addendum:  My son went through a rough period with regard to doubts about God, and our duty toward God and to society.  His lack of belief manifested itself in some defiant behavior which, unfortunately resulted in serious consequences.  Although he endured much suffering throughout about a 2-year-period, he soon realized that at least some of what I've been saying to him was true.

Before my first letter to my skeptical teenager which I posted Jan 2007, I wrote the following in a theology forum (Nov 2006), to help explain the nature of suffering:
I do have a son and my son will suffer, some of that suffering I could stop, but I don't. Why? Even if I could stop all of his suffering, I wouldn't because that would not be in accord with his greater good, him living to his fullest potential. Suffering brings character and from a supernatural viewpoint, holiness. Because I am not a Divine father, I am certainly tempted to take away any cross that he must carry, because I don't always know the reason for the suffering or see the greater good at the other end of that suffering. Yet, even though I am an imperfect father, I do understand that I need to reject my temptation to take away every suffering of his, because these are the crosses he must carry for his greater good. It is through these crosses that he is given the opportunity to become a child of God in a more perfect way. To take that away from him through misplaced intervention would be a greater evil.

For example, I know the girlfriend my teenager has will make him suffer. She already has, and there's undoubtedly more suffering to come.... (and I will suffer too).  Nonetheless...He will grow from the suffering he is about to endure. That he suffers is not the proof of his love for me, but is instead, like Job, a test of his faithfulness to God. If he should suffer with faithful endurance, it will be meritorious, thereby rewarding in the long term. It is foolish and erroneous to think that only the wicked suffer, and it would be incorrect of me to attempt to keep my son from the potential meritorious cross that he must carry.
Thanks be to God my son decided that his prodigal period wasn't what it was cracked up to be.



By the grace of God, my young "Augustine" was confirmed on Pentacost Sunday, 2009.




------------------------
[1] Centers for Disease Control, Division of STD Prevention, "Prevention of Genital HPV Infection and Sequelae: Report of an External Consultants' Meeting," 7.


[2] Collins, et al., "High incidence of cervical human papillomavirus infection in women during their first sexual relationship," BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology 109:1 (January, 2002): 96-98.

[3] Baeten, et al.,
"Hormonal contraception and risk of sexually transmitted disease acquisition: results from a prospective study," American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 185:2 (August, 2001): 380-385; Ley, et al., "Determinants of Genital Human Papillomavirus Infection in Young Women," Journal of the National Cancer Institute 83:14 (July, 1991): 997-1003; Prakash, et al., "Oral contraceptive use induces upregulation of the CCR5 chemokine receptor on CD4(+) T cells in the cervical epithelium of healthy women," Journal of Reproductive Immunology 54 (March, 2002): 117-131; Wang, et al., "Risk of HIV infection in oral contraceptive pill users: a meta-analysis," Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes 21:1 (May, 1999): 51-58; Lavreys, et al., "Hormonal contraception and risk of HIV-1 acquisition: results from a 10-year prospective study," AIDS 18:4 (March, 2004): 695-697.

[4] Chris Kahlenborn, MD, et al.,
"Oral Contraceptive Use as a Risk Factor for Premenopausal Breast Cancer: A Meta-analysis," Mayo Clinic Proceedings 81:10 (October, 2006): 1290-1302; Collaborative Group on Hormonal Factors in Breast Cancer, "Breast cancer and hormonal contraceptives: collaborative reanalysis of individual data on 53,297 women with breast cancer and 100,239 women without breast cancer from 54 epidemiological studies," Lancet 347 (June, 1996): 1713-1727; World Health Organization, "IARC Monographs Programme Finds Combined Estrogen-Progestogen Contraceptives and Menopausal Therapy are Carcinogenic to Humans," International Agency for Research on Cancer, Press Release 167 (July 29, 2005); Smith, et al., "Cervical cancer and use of hormonal contraceptives: A systematic review," Lancet 361 (2003):1159–1167; La Vecchia, "Oral contraceptives and cancer," Minerva Ginecologica 58:3 (June, 2006): 209-214.

[5] William F. Buckley, Jr., National Review, "Zounds! Enforcing the law in Idaho! - fornication," August 12, 1996).


[6] Edward O. Laumann, et al., The Social Organization of Sexuality: Sexual Practices in the United States (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1994), 503.


[7] Heritage Foundation, "The Harmful Effects of Early Sexual Activity and Multiple Sexual Parners Among Women: A Book of Charts."

Letters to a teenage skeptic, #4

This is a continuation of Letters to a teenage skeptic, #1 , #2 and #3.  See also #5.

----------------

My beloved Son,

In response to my question: Do you agree that there is a difference between truth and belief (the latter is subjective, the former is not)?


You said:
If I understand this question correctly, I do believe there is a difference between truth and belief. What one believes is not necessarily truth, although it may be. The thing is one can never know. I can assume you may use miracles to prove the existence of god, and my opinion about those is that god performs miracles to prove to us that we don't know squat about this earth compared to what he/she knows.
The part I'd like to address is "one can never know." If you are saying what I think you are saying, then you contend one can never know truth with any degree of certainty. In other words, you assert the thesis, "It is certain that nothing can be known with certainty." Thus, although one might think 2+2=4, you cannot know that this is true with certainty. Is that your claim? If so, I disagree.

I've been studying math, science, philosophy, and theology long enough to know that some things are "demonstratively certain".  Just because I am not perfect doesn't mean that I cannot be certain that 2+2=4, or that one cannot demonstrate the certainty that 2+2=4, or that it is equally certain that 2+2=5. As an analogy, although my eyesight is not perfect, that doesn't mean that I can't see some things quite clearly so as to have some level of certainty about what I do see.

If the thesis ("it is certain that nothing can be known with certainty") is true, then how do you know it is true?  Isn't the thesis a self-refuting thesis?  If you continue your thesis to its logical conclusion, then nothing can be known, we are always in doubt, and even our own existence cannot be known to be true, even our doubts must be doubted. Do you doubt your own existence?

Let's clarify some terms...

Doubt = state in which the mind is suspended between two contradictory propositions and unable to assent to either of them.

Assent, therefore, is the removal of doubt. When we assent to things that are "certain" in our mind, then we know longer have doubt.

Perhaps what you intended to say is that some things about reality are "incomprehensible" to human nature.  I agree. However, that does not imply that all things are incomprehensible, nor does that imply that we cannot know without a doubt some elements or characteristics of the incomprehensible things, based upon the available evidence.

Not all things are "demonstratably certain," nor do they need to be to be believed without a doubt. Our conclusions can be an assent based upon the preponderance of evidence. We can and must draw conclusions based upon the preponderance of evidence, even though human reasoning can be flawed. To do otherwise would be detrimental to maturity, growth, and living one's full potential.

Love and God bless,

Dad

See Letter's to a Teenage Skeptic, #5

Saturday, December 15, 2007

Mary and the Church

The following sermon is from Blessed Isaac of Stella, abbot (d. ca. 1169). It was included as part of today’s Divine Office. I thought it did a wonderful job of presenting how the Church understands the “woman clothed with the sun” (Rev 12:1) as simultaneously referring to both Holy Mother Mary and Holy Mother Church.

From the Book of Revelation 12:1-5:

“And a great portent appeared in heaven, a woman clothed with the sun, with the moon under her feet, and on her head a crown of twelve stars; she was with child and she cried out in her pangs of birth, in anguish for delivery. And another portent appeared in heaven; behold, a great red dragon…And the dragon stood before the woman who was about to bear a child, that he might devour her child when she brought it forth; she brought forth a male child, one who is to rule all the nations with a rod of iron, but her child was caught up to God and to his throne”

From a sermon by Blessed Isaac of Stella, abbot (Sermo 51: PL 194, 1862-1863, 1865, cited in the Divine Office, Saturday Office of Readings, Second Week of Advent):

The Son of God is the firstborn of many brothers. Although by nature he is the only-begotten, by grace he has joined many to himself and made them one with him. For to those who receive him he has given the power to become the sons of God.

He became the Son of man and made many men sons of God, uniting them to himself by his love and power, so that they became as one. In themselves they are many by reason of their human descent, but in him they are one by divine rebirth.

The whole Christ and the unique Christ—the body of the head—are one: one because born of the same God in heaven, and of the same mother on earth. They are many sons, yet one son. Head and members are one son, yet many sons; in the same way, Mary and the Church are one mother, yet more than one mother; one virgin, yet more than one virgin.

Both are mothers, both are virgins. Each conceives of the same Spirit, without concupiscence. Each gives birth to a child of God the Father, without sin. Without any sin, Mary gave birth to Christ the head for the sake of his body. By the forgiveness of every sin, the Church gave birth to the body, for the sake of its head. Each is Christ’s mother, but neither gives birth to the whole Christ without the cooperation of the other.

In the inspired Scriptures, what is said in a universal sense of the virgin mother, the Church is understood in an individual sense of the Virgin Mary, and what is said in a particular sense of the virgin mother Mary is rightly understood in a general sense of the virgin mother, the Church. When either is spoken of, the meaning can be understood of both, almost without qualification.

In a way, every Christian is also believed to be a bride of God’s Word, a mother of Christ, his daughter and sister, at once virginal and fruitful. These words are used in a universal sense of the Church, in a special sense of Mary, in a particular sense of the individual Christian. They are used by God’s Wisdom in person, the Word of the Father.

This is why Scripture says: I will dwell in the inheritance of the Lord. The Lord’s inheritance is, in a general sense, the Church; in a special sense, Mary; in an individual sense, the Christian. Christ dwelt for nine months in the tabernacle of Mary’s womb. He dwells until the end of the ages in the tabernacle of the Church’s faith. He will dwell for ever in the knowledge and love of the faithful soul.

God bless,

Dave

Wednesday, December 12, 2007

Theology of the Body

Catholic author Christopher West came to speak at our parish recently. Outstanding speaker. He spoke with regard to John Paul II's Theology of the Body and how John Paul II's teaching is an antidote to our modern pornographic culture. He explains that sexuality is not sinful, but due to the fall of man, it has become distorted, resulting in a pornographic culture which fails to see the beauty of sexuality as intended by God. If you have never heard of John Paul II's teaching called Theology of the Body, then I recommend Christopher West's Theology of the Body for Beginners . I also recommend his Q&A companion text called Good News About Sex and Marriage.

For those who are eager for more in depth teaching on this subject direct from John Paul II himself, you can purchase it in book form here: Theology of the Body , or you can read his teaching for free online here:

General Audiences: Theology of the Body
Pope John Paul II:

1. Of the Unity and Indissolubility of Marriage
On 5 September 1979, in the first of his General Audiences on the Theology of the Body, the Holy Father expounded the words of Christ, "In the beginning the Creator made them male and female."

2. Biblical Account of Creation Analysed
In his General Audience of 12 September 1979, the Holy Father compared two accounts of man's creation from Genesis, establishing basic principles for his study of the Theology of the Body.

3. The Second Account of Creation: The Subjective Definition of Man
In his General Audience of 19 September 1979, the Holy Father examined the account of man's creation in the second chapter of Genesis, observing its profundity in revealing the subjective side of creation in the image of God.

4. Boundary Between Original Innocence and Redemption
In his General Audience on 26 September 1979, the Holy Father considered a continuity between man's state of original innocence and the state of original sin, which left him open to the grace of redemption.

5. Meaning of Man's Original Solitude
In his General Audience on 10 October 1979, the Holy Father examined man's solitude, not as male, distinct from female, but in his nature as distinct from other living things, his difference in superiority, revealed to him in his self-consciousness.

6. Man's Awareness of Being a Person
In his General Audience on 24 October 1979, the Holy Father linked "man's original solitude," as different from and superior to other living creatures, with consciousness of his body.

7. In the Very Definition of Man, the Alternative Between Death and Immortality
In his General Audience on 31 October 1979, the Holy Father addressed again the solitude in which man was created, in relation to other creatures, but also with regard to his freedom of moral choice. The alternatives of death and immortality lay with him.

8. Original Unity of Man and Woman
In his General Audience of 7 November 1979, the Holy Father continued to lay groundwork for his Theology of the Body, meditating on Adam's "sleep" from which the division of the sexes emerged.

9. Man Becomes the Image of God by Communion of Persons
In his General Audience of 14 November 1979, the Holy Father located the image of God, in which man was created, not only in the solitude of his humanity, but also in the communion of persons, in the creation of the first man and woman in relation to each other.

10. Marriage One and Indissoluble in First Chapters of Genesis
In his General Audience of 21 November 1979, the Holy Father spoke on the communion of the first man and woman, how it renewed their original unity before separation in creation, and revealed the meaning of their bodies by their complementarity.

11. Meaning of Original Human Experiences
In his General Audience of 12 December 1979, the Holy Father observed that, in the Genesis account, the shame at their nakedness, experienced by the first man and woman after the Fall, contrasts with their original innocence, which invites further study of their original consciousness of their bodies.

12. Fullness of Interpersonal Communication
In his General Audience of 19 December 1979, the Holy Father continued his series on the Theology of the Body, analyzing the absence of shame in our first parents, despite their nakedness, and its bearing on their communication.

13. Creation as a Fundamental and Original Gift
In his General Audience of 2 January 1980, the Holy Father continued his study of the Theology of the Body, analyzing the consciousness of our first parents, in how they perceived each other, without shame in their nakedness, as good, and a mutual gift, part of the good gift of God's creation.

14. Revelation and Discovery of the Nuptial Meaning of the Body
In his General Audience of 9 January 1980, the Holy Father explained the "nuptial meaning" of the body as first experienced by Adam and Eve. Man, both male and female, realizes his essence only in living with and for someone else. The possibility of this mutual self-gift is manifested in the bodies of male and female, which gives them their nuptial meaning.

15. The Man-Person Becomes a Gift in the Freedom of Love
In his General Audience of 16 January 1980, the Holy Father continued his series on the Theology of the Body, by examining the "nuptial meaning of the body." Through self-mastery, by which the purely physical side of sex was restrained, the first man and woman were free to give themselves totally to each other, and thereby discovered their true selves.

16. Mystery of Man's Original Innocence
In his General Audience of 30 January 1980, the Holy Father pursued his examination of the Theology of the Body by dwelling on the mystery of man's original innocence, that purity of heart which enabled Adam and Eve to give themselves to each other in love, as the effect of grace.

17. Man and Woman: A Mutual Gift for Each Other
In his General Audience of 6 February 1980, the Holy Father reexamined the nuptial meaning of the body, in the mutual gift of self by our first parents, in the context of their original innocence.

18. Original Innocence and Man's Historical State
In his General Audience of 13 February 1980, the Holy Father reexamined our first parents' original innocence, as their nature was originally graced, how it affected their relationship to each other and the nuptial meaning of their bodies as male and female.

19. Man Enters the World as a Subject of Truth and Love
In his General Audience of 20 February 1980, the Holy Father continued his series on the Theology of the Body. Created in the image of God, man (Adam and Eve) entered the world as a primordial sacrament, a sign to the visible world of the invisible mystery hidden in God, the mystery of truth and love, the mystery of divine life, in which man really participates.

20. Analysis of Knowledge and of Procreation
In his General Audience of 5 March 1980, the Holy Father continued his series on the Theology of the Body, by examining the meaning of the biblical statement that "Adam knew Eve his wife" (Gn 4:1-2).

21. Mystery of Woman Revealed in Motherhood
In his General Audience of 12 March 1980, the Holy Father further examined the concept of mutual "knowledge" between the first man and woman. The woman is brought to full awareness of the mystery of creation, in its renewal in human generation.

22. Knowledge-Generation Cycle and Perspective of Death
In his General Audience of 26 March 1980, the Holy Father continued his catechesis on Theology of the Body. He further examined biblical "knowledge," as the nuptial relationship before the fall, a mutual, disinterested gift of self between spouses, contrasting it with the same relationship as a remedy for death after the fall.

23. Marriage in the Integral Vision of Man
In his General Audience of 2 April 1980, the Holy Father continued his series on Theology of the Body. Only by going back to the "beginning," as Christ did in answering the Pharisees on divorce, can we get a total vision of man, male and female, and only so can we adequately understand marriage and procreation.

24. Christ Appeals to Man's Heart
In his General Audience of 16 April 1980, the Holy Father continued his catechesis on Theology of the Body by turning to Christ's teaching, in the Sermon on the Mount, on adultery in the heart.

25. Ethical and Anthropological Content of the Commandment: You Shall Not Commit Adultery
At his General Audience of 23 April 1980, the Holy Father continued his series on Theology of the Body. He examined the meaning of adultery, which is a breach in the unity of husband and wife, even if only by an interior act ("adultery in the heart"). He cited the case of David and Bathsheba.

26. Lust is the Fruit of the Breach of the Covenant With God
In his General Audience of 30 April 1980, the Holy Father continued his catechesis on Theology of the Body. He examined the three-fold lust, of the flesh, of the eyes, and the pride of life, by which man broke God's original covenant.

27. Real Significance of Original Nakedness
In his General Audience of 14 May 1980, the Holy Father continued his series on Theology of the Body, explaining the nakedness of man after the fall as not merely physical. "...this man was deprived of the supernatural and preternatural gifts which were part of his endowment before sin. Furthermore, he suffered a loss in what belongs to his nature itself, to humanity in the original fullness of the image of God."

28. A Fundamental Disquiet in All Human Existence
In his General Audience of 2 June 1980, the Holy Father continued his catechesis on Theology of the Body. The shame experienced by man after his fall expressed a deeper shame, called "cosmic," reflecting a new disorder in his nature, by which not only was the relationship between man and woman affected, but the relationship between body and spirit.

29. Relationship of Lust to Communion of Persons
In his General Audience of 4 June 1980, the Holy Father continued his catechesis on Theology of the Body. He examined the radical transformation wrought by lust and shame in the original relationship between the first man and woman.

30. Dominion Over the Other in the Interpersonal Relation
In his General Audience of 18 June 1980, the Holy Father continued his series on Theology of the Body. Because of their sin, the man and woman feel shame toward each other, their communion is weakened, and he will exercise dominion over her.

31. Lust Limits Nuptial Meaning of the Body
In his General Audience of 25 June 1980, the Holy Father continued his catechesis on Theology of the Body. The sin of Adam and Eve distorted the "nuptial meaning of the body," its masculinity/femininity, which was meant to shape their communion. Their relationship was corrupted by lust, which includes the desire to possess the other, rather than receive him/her as a free gift.

32. The Heart a Battlefield Between Love and Lust
In his General Audience of 23 July 1980, the Holy Father continued his catechesis on Theology of the Body. After the fall, human sexuality was marked by a certain "coercion of the body," which subverts the expression of the spirit seeking the communion of persons, male and female, through a mutual gift of self. "The more lust dominates the heart, the less the heart experiences the nuptial meaning of the body."

33. Opposition in the Human Heart between the Spirit and the Body
In his General Audience of 30 July 1980, the Holy Father continued his catechesis on Theology of the Body. The nuptial meaning of the body is destroyed when man or woman seeks to possess the other as an object, but not when each belongs to the other through self-giving.

34. Sermon on the Mount to the Men of Our Day
In his General Audience of 6 August 1980, the Holy Father, continuing his catechesis on Theology of the Body, examined the the "hardness of heart," which all men share with Our Lord's auditors, and its connection with the three-fold lust which is our heritage from Adam.

35. Content of the Commandment: You Shall Not Commit Adultery
In his General Audience of 13 August 1980, the Holy Father continued his catechesis on Theology of the Body. He presented Our Lord's teaching against adultery "in the heart" as a return to the spirit of the law, whose letter had been stretched to allow polygamy.

36. Adultery According to the Law and as Spoken by the Prophets
In his General Audience of 20 August 1980, the Holy Father continued his catechesis on Theology of the Body. He examines the emphasis of the matrimonial law on the "procreative end of marriage," and of the prophets on the uniqueness of the spousal relationship between God and Israel, contrary to the prevailing polygamy.

37. Adultery: A Breakdown of the Personal Covenant
In his General Audience of 27 August 1980, the Holy Father continued his catechetical cycle on Theology of the Body, on the subject of adultery. Adultery is a sin of the body, violating exclusive matrimonial rights between a man and a woman, which constitutes a breakdown of the personal covenant between them.

38. Meaning of Adultery Transferred from the Body to the Heart
In his General Audience of 3 September 1980, the Holy Father continued his catechesis on Theology of the Body, focusing on adultery, its place in the Wisdom tradition, and the change in emphasis introduced by Christ.

39. Concupiscence as a Separation From Matrimonial Significance of the Body
In his General Audience of 10 September 1980, the Holy Father continued his series on Theology of the Body. He gave a description of the inner effects of lust from the Wisdom tradition and then compared it with the teaching of Christ on "adultery in the heart."

40. Mutual Attraction Differs from Lust
In his General Audience of 17 September 1980, the Holy Father continued his analysis of adultery in his series on Theology of the Body. The mutual attraction between a man and a woman, encompassing a "gamut of spiritual-corporal desires," to which a "proportionate pyramid of values" corresponds, differs from lust, in that the latter reduces the pyramid to one level, sex, as an object of gratification.

41. Depersonalizing Effect of Concupiscence
In his General Audience of 24 September 1980, the Holy Father further examined "adultery in the heart," spoken of by Our Lord in His Sermon on the Mount. When a woman is looked at lustfully by a man, she ceases to be regarded as a subject of personal attraction or communion, but only as an object of sexual satisfaction. And when this "intention" reaches the will, the man himself becomes enslaved.

42. Establishing the Ethical Sense
In his General Audience of 1 October 1980, the Holy Father continued his analysis of the words of Our Lord, in His Sermon on the Mount, concerning adultery in the heart. It is not merely a matter of lusting after a woman who is not one's wife, but of looking at her in a way dismissive of her dignity as well as of one's own.

43. Interpreting the Concept of Concupiscence
In his General Audience of 8 October 1980, the Holy Father concluded his analysis of adultery in the heart, by observing that it is an attitude of a man toward a woman (or vice versa) which reduces the communion of persons to satisfaction of an instinct. One may be guilty of this attitude towards one's own spouse.

44. Gospel Values and Duties of the Human Heart
In his General Audience of 15 October 1980, the Holy Father continued his analysis of "adultery in the heart" by distinguishing condemnation of lust from a condemnation of the body.

45. Realization of the Value of the Body According to the Plan of the Creator
In his General Audience of 22 October 1980, the Holy Father clarified the meaning of lust, in his catechesis on Theology of the Body. Christ warned against lusting after a woman, not to condemn the body as evil (Manichaeism), but to condemn the devaluation of the body in its nuptial meaning, i.e., the manifestation of communion in spirit.

46. Power of Redeeming Completes Power of Creating
In his General Audience of 29 October 1980, the Holy Father continued his catechesis on "adultery in the heart" by examining the three forms of lust ("of the flesh," "of the eyes," and the "pride of life") spoken of by St. John (1 Jn 2:15-16), in relation to the skewed pictures of man presented by Freud, Marx and Nietzsche. The truth of his humanity, the ability to love, is deeper than the three lusts.

47. Eros and Ethos Meet and Bear Fruit in the Human Heart
In his General Audience of 5 November 2004, the Holy Father explained that the warning of Christ against looking lustfully at a woman is less an accusation than an appeal, that what the heart desires (eros) should also be what is right (ethos).

48. Spontaneity: The Mature Result of Conscience
In his General Audience of 12 November 1980, the Holy Father continued his catechesis on Theology of the Body by examining the notion that subjection of an erotic attraction to an ethical form deprives it of its spontaneity.

49. Christ Calls Us to Rediscover the Living Forms of the New Man
In his General Audience of 3 December 1980, the Holy Father continued his catechesis on Theology of the Body, with regard to adultery in the heart, by focusing on the ethos of redemption, which calls for temperance in the natural erotic attraction between a man and a woman.

50. Purity of Heart
In his General Audience of 10 December 1980, the Holy Father completed his study of adultery in the heart with a consideration of purity of heart, and how the Lord distinguished this from mere ritual purity.

51. Justification in Christ
In his General Audience of 17 December 1980, the Holy Father continued his catechesis on Theology of the Body by examining the conflict between "flesh" and "spirit" in the teaching of St. Paul. The lusts of the worldly man can be overcome by his spirit when empowered by the Holy Spirit.

52. Opposition Between the Flesh and the Spirit
In his General Audience of 7 January 1981, the Holy Father continued his catechesis on Theology of the Body by examining St. Paul's doctrine of justification, and in particular the opposition between life according to the flesh and life according to the Spirit (of God).

53. Life in the Spirit Based on True Freedom
In his General Audience of 14 January 1981, the Holy Father continued his catechesis on Theology of the Body by further examination of St. Paul's teaching on life according to the Spirit. It is purity of heart, which is the necessary condition for charity and true freedom.

54. St. Paul's Teaching on the Sanctity and Respect of the Human Body
In his General Audience of 28 January 1981, the Holy Father continued his catechesis on Theology of the Body by examining St. Paul's teaching on purity, in 1 Thessalonians 4, that we should control our bodies in holiness and honor.

55. St. Paul's Description of the Body and Teaching on Purity
In his General Audience of 4 February 1981, the Holy Father continued his catechesis on Theology of the Body by examining St. Paul's teaching on the body from 1 Corinthians 12. The human body is more than the sum of its biological characteristics. It is permeated by the "whole reality of the person and of his dignity."

56. The Virtue of Purity Is the Expression and Fruit of Life According to the Spirit
In his General Audience of 11 February 1981, the Holy Father continued his catechesis on Theology of the Body, by further examining St. Paul's teaching on purity. It is identifiable as the virtue of temperance, but includes an element of respect for the body, as a temple of the Holy Spirit.

57. The Pauline Doctrine of Purity as Life According to the Spirit
In his General Audience of 18 March 1981, the Holy Father continued his catechesis on Theology of the Body by further examination of St. Paul's teaching on purity. This virtue is reinforced by piety, a gift of the indwelling Holy Spirit, by which God is glorified.

58. Positive Function of Purity of Heart
In his General Audience 1 April 1981, the Holy Father gathered the main threads of his teaching on Theology of the Body, as based on the words of Christ on man's creation as male and female, and his warning against adultery in the heart. Lust can be displaced only by purity of heart, which, in the teaching of St. Paul, is a gift of the Holy Spirit.

59. Pronouncements of Magisterium Apply Christ's Words Today
In his General Audience of 8 April 1981, the Holy Father concluded his reflections on the words of Christ, in the Sermon on the Mount, on adultery in the heart. These words are key to the Theology of the Body, which underlies the thinking of many recent magisterial pronouncements.

60. The Human Body, Subject of Works of Art
In his General Audience of 15 April 1981, the Holy Father continued his catechesis on Theology of the Body, laying groundwork for a consideration of the human body in aesthetic experience, and how it relates to Our Lord's warning against looking with lust.

61. Reflections on the Ethos of the Human Body in Works of Artistic Culture
In his General Audience of 22 April 1981, the Holy Father continued his catechesis on Theology of the Body, examining the implications of exposure of the human body in artistic culture for the mutual donation of husband and wife.

62. Art Must Not Violate the Right to Privacy
In his General Audience of 29 April 1981, the Holy Father continued his catechesis on Theology of the Body by examining the limits beyond which art must not go in depicting masculinity or femininity.

63. Ethical Responsibilities in Art
In his General Audience of 6 May 1981, the Holy Father concluded his reflections on the Sermon on the Mount, concerning adultery in the heart, with respect to artistic depictions of the human body.

64. Marriage and Celibacy in the Light of the Resurrection of the Body
In his General Audience of 11 November 1981, the Holy Father began a new segment of his catechesis on theology of the body, basing his talk on the words of Christ to the Sadducees on the general resurrection. "These words are of fundamental importance for understanding marriage in the Christian sense and also the renunciation of conjugal life for the kingdom of heaven."

65. The Living God Continually Renews the Very Reality of Life
In his General Audience of 18 November 1981, the Holy Father continued his catechesis on theology of the body, by returning to the words of Christ to the Sadducees on the general resurrection. They deny the resurrection because they doubt the power of God.

66. The Resurrection and Theological Anthropology
In his General Audience of 2 December 1981, the Holy Father continued his catechesis on Theology of the Body, by addressing the teaching of Christ on the relationship between male and female after the general resurrection.

67. The Resurrection Perfects the Person
In his General Audience of 9 December 1981, the Holy Father continued his catechesis on Theology of the Body, with particular regard for the general resurrection, in which the body will be spiritualized, and both body and spirit divinized, in the vision of God.

68. Christ's Words on the Resurrection Complete the Revelation of the Body
In his General Audience of 16 December 1981, the Holy Father continued his focus on Christ's words about our condition after the general resurrection in his catechesis on theology of the body. Each person sharing in the beatific vision will have his own subjectivity perfected, and yet, in view of the Communion of the Trinity, experience a new depth of intersubjectivity which is the Communion of Saints. It will be virginal, and yet reveal the full nuptial meaning of the body, as a gift to God first, and through Him to others.

69. New Threshold of Complete Truth About Man
In his General Audience of 13 January 1982, the Holy Father continued his exposition of the words of Christ on the general resurrection, as applied to Theology of the Body. In some way difficult to imagine, the meaning of the human body will be revealed as the means of mutual self-giving in the communion of Saints.

70. Doctrine of the Resurrection according to St. Paul
In his General Audience of 27 January 1982, the Holy Father continued his catechesis on Theology of the Body by further examining St. Paul's teaching, in 1 Corinthians 15, on the general resurrection. The resurrection of the body completes man's redemption from the effects of sin.

71. The Risen Body Will Be Incorruptible, Glorious, Dynamic, and Spiritual
In his General Audience of 3 February 1982, the Holy Father continued his catechesis on Theology of the Body, by describing the body, at the general resurrection, as the fulfillment of the human aspiration to glory. This aspiration reflects the potentiality with which we were created to become conformed to the risen Christ.

72. Body's Spiritualization Will Be Source of Its Power and Incorruptibility
In his General Audience of 10 February 1982, the Holy Father continued his catechesis on Theology of the Body by concluding his study of St. Paul's teaching on the general resurrection. Resurrected man, no longer weakened through his resistance to the Spirit, will be fully vivified, attaining the fullness for which he was created.

73. Virginity or Celibacy for the Sake of the Kingdom
In his General Audience of 10 March 1982, the Holy Father began a new series on virginity/celibacy for the kingdom of heaven, in furtherance of his catechesis on theology of the body. A vocation to celibacy is an anticipation of that eschatological state when men "neither marry nor are given in marriage."

74. The Vocation to Continence in This Earthly Life
In his General Audience of 17 March 1982, the Holy Father continued his talks on celibacy/virginity for the sake of the kingdom of heaven. This new ideal, though a departure from the Old Testament tradition of marriage, shed light on the theology of the body.

75. Continence for the Sake of the Kingdom Meant to Have Spiritual Fulfillment
In his General Audience of 24 March 1982, the Holy Father continued his talks on celibacy/virginity for the sake of the kingdom of heaven. It is a charismatic sign that in heaven people will no longer marry, because God will be everything to everyone. Departure from the Old Testament tradition of marriage and procreation was effected especially by the example of Christ himself.

76. The Effective and Privileged Way of Continence
In his General Audience of 31 March 1982, the Holy Father continued his talks on celibacy/virginity for the sake of the kingdom of heaven. Marriage is not depreciated, but continence has an exceptional value, when chosen with a supernatural motive.

77. Superiority of Continence Does Not Devalue Marriage
In his General Audience of 7 April 1982, the Holy Father continued his catechesis on theology of the body, addressing the superiority of continence. It is superior to marriage, not based not on any devaluation of sexuality or of the human body, but on the motive for which continence is chosen, viz., the kingdom of heaven.

78. Marriage and Continence Complement Each Other
In his General Audience of 14 April 1982, the Holy Father continued his instruction on the relationship between marriage and continence. Those called to either state fulfill their calling in a spiritual paternity or maternity toward those in their care. And the nature of both is conjugal, being expressed in the total gift of oneself.

79. The Value of Continence Is Found in Love
In his General Audience of 21 April 1982, the Holy Father continued his catechesis on Theology of the Body, with regard to the choice of virginity or celibacy. Continence for the sake of the Kingdom of Heaven is the nuptial gift of self to Christ, the Spouse of the soul.

80. Celibacy Is a Particular Response to the Love of the Divine Spouse
In his General Audience of 28 April 1982, the Holy Father continued his catechesis on Theology of the Body by further explaining continence for the sake of the Kingdom of Heaven as the particular response of virginity/celibacy to the self-gift of the divine Spouse in the Paschal and Eucharistic Mystery.

81. Celibacy for the Kingdom Affirms Marriage
In his General Audience of 5 May 1982, the Holy Father continued his catechesis on Theology of the Body, by concluding his considerations on Christ's words recommending continence for the sake of the Kingdom of Heaven. Renunciation of marriage for the sake of the Kingdom affirms the value of what is renounced, in the gift of self to God.

82. Voluntary Continence Derives From a Counsel, Not From a Command
In his General Audience of 23 June 1982, the Holy Father continued his catechesis on Theology of the Body, by addressing St. Paul's treatment of virginity and marriage. Consecrated virginity is a matter of counsel, not command, so that marriage is no sin, though voluntary virginity is better.

83. The Unmarried Person Is Anxious to Please the Lord
In his General Audience of 30 June 1982, the Holy Father continued his catechesis on Theology of the Body, by examining St. Paul's statement in 1 Corinthians 7, that one who marries does well, but one who chooses continence or virginity does better. Continence makes more room to be anxious for "the things of the Lord," to please the Lord and work for the growth of His Church.

84. Everyone Has His Own Gift from God, Suited to His Vocation
In his General Audience of 7 July 1982, the Holy Father continued his catechesis on Theology of the Body, by further examination of St. Paul's statement that it is better to choose continence than to marry. While the gift of continence allows an undivided love for God, the grace of marriage is a true gift, suited to that state in life.

85. The Kingdom of God, Not the World, Is Man's Eternal Destiny
In his General Audience of 14 July 1982, the Holy Father continued his catechesis on Theology of the Body. He further examined St. Paul's teaching on the complementarity of continence and marriage, both vocations having in view the future life.

86. Mystery of the Body's Redemption Basis of Teaching on Marriage and Voluntary Continence
In his General Audience of 21 July 1982, the Holy Father continued his catechesis on Theology of the Body. The eschatological redemption of the body, in victory over death, is the inspiration for man's victory over sin in daily life, whether in marriage or in celibacy.

87. Marital Love Reflects God's Love for His People
In his General Audience of 28 July 1982, the Holy Father continued his catechesis on theology of the body by laying the groundwork for an examination of St. Paul's teaching on marriage in the fifth chapter of Ephesians. Marriage, as a sacrament, signifies the relationship between Christ and His Church, and before that, the spousal love between God and his chosen people.

88. The Call to Be Imitators of God and to Walk in Love
In his General Audience of 4 August 1982, the Holy Father continued his examination of the fifth chapter of Ephesians as part of his ongoing catechesis on theology of the body. The prescriptions for family relationships should be understood in light of the Apostle's teaching on the Christian vocation.

89. Reverence for Christ the Basis of Relationship Between Spouses
In his General Audience of 11 August 1982, the Holy Father continued his catechesis on theology of the body, by examining more closely the right relationship between husband and wife as described in the fifth chapter of the Letter to the Ephesians.

90. A Deeper Understanding of the Church and Marriage
In his General Audience of 18 August 1982, the Holy Father continued his catechesis on theology of the body, looking more closely at the two-way analogy found in Ephesians 5, between the relationship of husband and wife and the relationship of Christ and His Church.

91. St Paul's Analogy of the Union of Head and Body
In his General Audience of 25 August 1982, the Holy Father continued his catechesis on theology of the body, by further examination of Ephesians 5. He focussed attention on the analogy of head and body, as analogous to both the Christ-Church relationship and the husband-wife relationship.

92. Sacredness of the Human Body and Marriage
In his General Audience of 1 September 1982, the Holy Father infers the sacredness of the human body from the analogy of love in Ephesians 5, between Christ for His Church and a husband for his wife.

93. Christ's Redemptive Love Has Spousal Nature
In his General Audience of 8 September 1982, the Holy Father continued his exposition of the fifth chapter of Ephesians, focusing on the meaning of the word "mystery," as it applies to God's plan, its revelation in Christ, Christ's relationship to the Church, and the sacraments of the Church.

94. Moral Aspects of the Christian's Vocation
In his General Audience of 15 September 1982, the Holy Father continued his exposition of the fifth chapter of Ephesians, by showing how the mystery of God's love, hidden for ages, was revealed in Jesus Christ, with an emphasis on his spousal donation of Himself to the Church and His members' participation in the mystery.

95. Relationship of Christ to the Church Connected With the Tradition of the Prophets
In his General Audience of 22 September 1982, the Holy Father, in light of Ephesians 5, compared the relationship of Christ with His Church to the relationship, described by the Old Testament Prophets, of God with Israel. Whereas, in Isaiah, God is Israel's spouse as her Maker, in Ephesians, Christ is the Church's spouse as her Redeemer.

96. Analogy of Spousal Love Indicates the Radical Character of Grace
In his General Audience of 29 September 1982, the Holy Father continued his catechesis on theology of the body by further examination of the spousal relationship between Christ and His Church in Ephesians 5. Of the various biblical analogies of the mystery of God's love, the marriage analogy most emphasizes God's gift of Himself to His people.

97. Marriage Is the Central Point of the Sacrament of Creation
In his General Audience of 6 October 1982, the Holy Father continued his exposition of fifth chapter of the Letter to the Ephesians, for the light it sheds on marriage as the "primordial" sacrament in the state of man's original innocence.

98. Loss of Original Sacrament Restored with Redemption in Marriage-Sacrament
In his General Audience of 13 October 1982, Pope John Paul II continued his exposition of the fifth chapter of the Letter to the Ephesians, by relating Christ's redemptive love to marriage as instituted in the beginning, when it was a sacrament of God's gift of Himself to man and woman at their creation.

99. Marriage an Integral Part of New Sacramental Economy
In his General Audience of 20 October 1982, the Holy Father continued his commentary on Ephesians 5, to give further insights into his Theology of the Body. Marriage is so fundamental to the order of redemption established by Christ that "all the sacraments of the new covenant find their prototype in marriage as the primordial sacrament."

100. Indissolubility of Sacrament of Marriage in Mystery of the Redemption of the Body
In his General Audience of 27 October 1982, the Holy Father continued his catechesis on marriage in light of Ephesians 5. Man and woman becoming one flesh in marriage, as signifying the relationship between Christ and His Church, is a sign of the redemption of the body at the end of time.

101. Christ Opened Marriage to the Saving Action of God
In his General Audience of 24 November 1982, the Holy Father reexamined Ephesians 5 in light of the words of the Gospel, in which Christ, speaking to the Pharisees and in the Sermon on the Mount, confirmed marriage as a sacrament instituted by the Creator at the beginning. It is the sign of God's original covenant, according to which man, both male and female, would be sanctified and adopted by God.

102. Marriage Sacrament an Effective Sign of God's Saving Power
In his General Audience of 1 December 1982, the Holy Father drew together texts from the Gospel, Romans, and I Corinthians to shed further light on marriage as presented in Ephesians 5. This primordial sacrament prepares for the eschatological hope of the general resurrection in procreating sons and daughters who are to participate in the resurrection, and thus experience the redemption of the body.

103. The Redemptive and Spousal Dimensions of Love
In his general audience of 15 December 1982, the Holy Father continued his commentary on Ephesians 5, for further insights into marriage and the Theology of the Body. The original structure of marriage, as a sacrament of creation, "is renewed in the mystery of the redemption, when that mystery assumes the aspect of the spousal love of the Church on the part of Christ."

104. The Substratum and Content of the Sacramental Sign of Spousal Communion
In his General Audience of 5 January 1983, the Holy Father continued his catechesis on Theology of the Body by analyzing the sign (form) of the sacrament of marriage into two aspects: the expression of the will to be united (the wedding vows), and the actual union when the marriage is consummated.

105. The Language of the Body in the Structure of Marriage
In his General Audience of 12 January 1983, the Holy Father analyzed the sacramentality of marriage under the aspect of a sign. The sign is expressed in the language of the body, in its masculinity or femininity, as a personal gift to its spouse.

106. The Sacramental Covenant in the Dimension of Sign
In his General Audience of 19 January 1983, the Holy Father explains that the sign of the Sacrament of Marriage is constituted by the words of matrimonial consent, "because the spousal significance of the body in its masculinity and femininity is found expressed in them." In giving their consent, the spouses confirm their participation in the "prophetic mission of the Church received from Christ."

107. Language of the Body Strengthens the Marriage Covenant
In his General Audience of 26 January 1983, the Holy Father continued his analysis of the "language of the body" as expressed in the marriage covenant between spouses. They "reread" the language of the body in their living together as a communion of persons.

108. Man Called to Overcome Concupiscence
In his General Audience of 9 February 1983, the Holy Father continued his analysis of the "language of the body," expressed in the marriage covenant, but now with consideration of its misreading in the man of concupiscence. He/she is called by Christ to return from sin to chastity in rereading the truth of the body in the mystery of redemption.

109. Return to the Subject of Human Love in the Divine Plan
In his General Audience of 23 May 1984, the Holy Father (after a hiatus devoted to reflections on the Holy Year) resumed his treatment of the topic of human love in the divine plan. He began an analysis of the Song of Songs, situating it within the tradition of marital love reaching back to Genesis. It is the sign of the covenant made by God with man in the beginning.

110. Truth and Freedom the Foundation of True Love
In his General Audience of 30 May 1984, the Holy Father continued his analysis of the Song of Songs for further examination of the sacramental sign of marriage. It is expressed in the "language of the body," which begins in the heart. It reflects the familiarity of friendship, but also the mystery of a woman's interior inviolability, which is freely given to the man.

111. Love Is Ever Seeking and Never Satisfied
In his General Audience of 6 June 1984, the Holy Father continued his analysis of the Song of Songs in connection with his catechesis on Theology of the Body. On the basis of a love which is both spiritual and sensual, the significance of the body is reread, and their union becomes the sign of the mutual gift of self.

112. Love Is Victorious in the Struggle Between Good and Evil
In his General Audience of 27 June 1984, the Holy Father examined the Book of Tobit for the light it sheds on Theology of the Body. Here the devotion of the spouses is expressed not in words of loving transport, as in the Song of Songs, but in the "choices and the actions that take on all the weight of human existence in the union of the two."

113. The Language of the Body: Actions and Duties Forming the Spirituality of Marriage
In his General Audience of 4 July 1984, the Holy Father continued his catechesis on Theology of the Body. He returned to the fifth chapter of Ephesians to examine how the "language of the body" is elevated by the language of liturgy to a "great mystery," the Sacrament of Matrimony.

114. Morality of Marriage Act Determined by Nature of the Act and of the Subjects
In his General Audience of 11 July 1984, the Holy Father turned to reflections on Paul VI's Humanae Vitae as an application of his catechesis on the theology of human love in God's plan. He spoke on the inseparable connection "between the unitive significance and the procreative significance which are both inherent to the marriage act."

115. The Norm of Humanae Vitae Arises from the Natural Law and the Revealed Order
In his General Audience of 18 July 1984, the Holy Father continued his exposition of the Encyclical, Humanae Vitae, observing that its moral norm--marital openness to procreation--not only accords with natural law (reason) and the revealed moral law, but finds support in the Theology of the Body.

116. Importance of Harmonizing Human Love with Respect for Life
In his General Audience of 25 July 1984, the Holy Father continued his reflections, linking Humanae Vitae with the theology of human love in God's plan. The Theology of the Body, offering confirmation of the moral norm in the Encyclical, prepares us to consider more deeply, from a pastoral perspective, the difficulty of complying with the norm.

117. Responsible Parenthood
In his general audience of 1 August 1984, the Holy Father continued his analysis of Humanae Vitae in light of Gaudium et Spes, underlining the principle that, while responsible parenthood follows the dictates of conscience, conscience must conform to the "objective moral order instituted by God."

118. Faithfulness to the Divine Plan in the Transmission of Life
In his general audience of 8 August 1984, the Holy Father continued his analysis of Humanae Vitae, in comparing natural regulation of fertility with contraception. There is an essential difference between the two, the former following the lead of nature, the latter obstructing it.

119. Church's Position on Transmission of Life
At his General Audience of 22 August 1984, the Holy Father continued his reflections on Humanae Vitae, by focussing on the "essence of the Church's doctrine on the transmission of life." The language of the body, in order to be true, as conforming to the moral order, should signify not only the unitive aspect, but the procreative aspect, of marriage.

120. A Discipline That Ennobles Human Love
In his General Audience of 28 August 1984, the Holy Father continued his reflections on Humanae Vitae, turning his attention to natural regulation of fertility, which is consistent with responsible parenthood, though artificial contraception is not.

121. Responsible Parenthood Linked to Moral Maturity
In his general audience of 5 September 1984, the Holy Father continued his exposition of the Church's teaching on natural regulation of fertility, in light of Humanae Vitae and Familiaris Consortio. It is the ethical dimension, in the virtue of temperance, that prevents this method from becoming just another form of contraception.

122. Prayer, Penance and the Eucharist: Principal Sources of Spirituality for Married Couples
In his General Audience of 3 October 1984, the Holy Father continued his exposition of Humanae Vitae, showing the relationship between the "honest practice of fertility regulation" and the "Christian spirituality of the conjugal vocation and life."

123. The Power of Love Is Given to Man and Woman as a Share in God's Love
In his General Audience of 10 October 1984, the Holy Father continued his exposition of Humanae Vitae, as it bore on his Theology of the Body. The love that God gives to husband and wife is a supernatural power enabling them to coordinate their actions toward the good of marriage, a communion of persons, while safeguarding the connection between the "two meanings of the conjugal act," the unitive and the procreative.

124. Continence Protects the Dignity of the Conjugal Act
In his General Audience of 24 October 1984, the Holy Father gave close examination to the virtue of continence, in light of the teaching of Humanae Vitae. Continence in marriage not only resists concupiscence, but enlarges the capacity of husband and wife to love each other.

125. Continence Frees One from Inner Tension
In his General Audience of 31 October 1984, the Holy Father continued his treatment of the virtue of continence in light of the teaching of Humanae Vitae. He distinguished between excitement, which tends toward the conjugal act, and emotion which is an affectionate response to the masculinity or femininity of the marital partner. Continence gives direction to both.

126. Continence Deepens Personal Communion
At the General Audience on 7 November 1984, Pope John Paul II continued his analysis of the virtue of continence in light of Humanae Vitae. The virtue of continence has "not only the capacity to contain bodily and sensual reactions, but even more the capacity to control and guide man's whole sensual and emotive sphere."

127. Christian Spirituality of Marriage by Living According to the Spirit
In his General Audience of 14 November 1984, the Holy Father continued his exposition of Humanae Vitae for the light it sheds on the role of chastity in married life. The virtue of chastity not only regulates manifestations of affection, but opens the couple to the gifts of the Holy Spirit, by which they are enabled to achieve a communion of persons.

128. Respect for the Work of God
In his General Audience of 21 November 1984, the Holy Father traced an outline of conjugal spirituality, based on the teaching of Humanae Vitae. He explained the gift of piety, respect for the work of God, with particular reference to the significance of the conjugal act, "its dignity and the consequent serious responsibility connected with it."

129. Conclusion to the Series: Redemption of the Body and Sacramentality of Marriage
In his General Audience of 28 November 1984, the Holy Father concluded his four-year catechesis on Theology of the Body with a summary of his conclusions. His catechesis was divided into two parts: the first was a study of Christ's words on marriage and their implications for the redemption of the body, and the second, an analysis of the sacramentality of marriage as presented in Ephesians 5, with added insights from Humanae Vitae.